Because: size and weight. It looks to be too big and too heavy for my idea of its best use role. The existing lenses in this segment are the 24-105 f4.0, the 24-70 f/2.8 and the 28-70 f/2.0, all very good performing lenses. The first two are also fairly compact and light, while the 3rd isn't, but has a truly rare, for any zoom, really wide
The current IBIS tech in mirrorless bodies makes the F4 more than adequate for a variety of light situation. If they make it F2.8 and double the weight/size, not to mention price, who is going to carry this around all day. It defeats the purpose of having a 24-105 zoom in the first place. The Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8 L IS USM is the lens that pros and serious shutterbugs will want for their full-frame camera. Weight: 2 lb Filter Thread: 82 mm the RF 24-105mm F4-7.1 is a better

Canon EOS R100 RF-S18-45mm F4.5-6.3 is STM Lens Kit, Mirrorless Camera, RF Mount, 24.1 MP, Continuous Shooting, Eye Detection AF, Full HD Video, 4K, Lightweight, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Content Creation 4.5 out of 5 stars 64

Suited to landscapes, events and travel, a versatile Canon 24-105 mm lens remains lightweight and suited to intrepid photographers Quick View Canon RF 24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens
For me, this new 24-105 will be too much extra size, weight, and price over the already excellent 24-105 F4. Yes, my RF 24-105 f4 is an outstanding lens. It's my go-to lens for event photography.
1 day ago · If so, the X-H2S is a much better video body. While the R6 II is no slouch in that department, it's just not going to be comparable to the X-H2S' 6.2k open-gate, 4k120fps at high bit rate and F-Log 2 in-camera 14-bit readout. Otherwise for stills, I would go with the R6 II if you are okay with the RF lens line-up. EjZ9QX.
  • fyk4u3j2qa.pages.dev/426
  • fyk4u3j2qa.pages.dev/164
  • fyk4u3j2qa.pages.dev/557
  • fyk4u3j2qa.pages.dev/252
  • fyk4u3j2qa.pages.dev/297
  • fyk4u3j2qa.pages.dev/528
  • fyk4u3j2qa.pages.dev/340
  • fyk4u3j2qa.pages.dev/479

    • canon rf 24 105 f4 weight